Real ‘Angle of Mercy’ During the Crimean War Essay

Do you agree with the view that bloody shame Seacole , and not Florence nightingale , was the real angle of mercifulness during the Crimean War? During the Crimean war, both Mary Seacole and Florence nightingale showed aspects of creation paragons. The word nonpareil suggests a ethereal person who is oversolicitous to the soldiers needs, and lenity means showing kindness and forgiveness, and the angel of mercy basically suggests a com maniaated and kind-hearted person who empathizes and helps soldiers in need. Although Nightingale had showed the aspects of beingness an angel of mercy, the amount of work and commission Seacole had erect in outweighs Nightingales thence I believe Mary Seacole deserves the en name of the real angel of mercy. Florence Nightingale actions mainly focused on the hygiene and exoneratedliness, and the placement of the hospital since the majority of the death was due to flatten of sanitation. Source U is a lithograph of one of the wards in the urge on Hospital in Scutari, where Nightingale was in charge of. It showed the hospital was distinctly clean and organize with windows opened, clean floor, wide space between organized beds, suggesting that the soldiers conditions were getting better.Nightingale was overly very hardworking, because even at wickedness she used to walk around the hospital carrying a lamp to check on the longanimouss, hence she is also known as the The Lady with the Lamp throughout the history, which shows her commitment in her work as a nurse. She surely had formidable gifts of organization as it says on source V, and her involvement in the war had also made a huge impact on the death rate, which cut back from 42 per 1000 to 2 per 1000 in June 1855. Despite the squ ar up of the death, 5000 men died in her hospital due to poor hygiene in the winter of 1854-1855 before the sanitary commission arrived, yet she refused to acknowledged that it was from the overlook of sanitation and said the men we re half dead when they were brought in, because at that condemnation she didnt know that the hospital was built on top of a cesspool. On top of that, it was revealed in the letter written by gentle Palmerston to Lord Panto a greater extent that the sanitary arrangement was actually done by Dr. Sutherland and Dr. Grainger, and electrostatic Nightingale took all the credit.Even though, Nightingale has made positive impacts on the course of the war and paved a way for improving in the nursing field, her actions arent enough to fit the externalise of an angel of mercy, since she was a harsh, cold woman who criticized her own nurses and only checked the patients from a distance, completely neglecting the importance of consoling and communicating with the soldiers, as it is also shown on the source U on the lithograph Nightingale is seen leading the injure however, she keeps a distance inbetween. This shows that Nightingale is recognized through the image of the clean organized ward , rather than a kind-hearted and compassionated nurse treating the patients, and the angel of mercy ought to tender both physical and moral needs to the soldier as the title says, since they get out not only suffer physical attacks simply will also be mentally affected by the war, and Nightingale failed to return mental treatment.On the other hand, Mary Seacoles engagements fit the image of the angel of mercy and source V praises Seacole and her involvement during the war, despite being rejected by the British authorities due to her race and background. She went to Crimea by herself to help the wounded, whereas Nightingale who went there in request of the Minister of War, Sidney Herbert, to go to help in the war. Seacole had no hospital to take care of the wounded, but she built her own British Hotel in Balacava by her money, contradictory the political sympathies funded admirable hospital in Scutari, which took days of boat trip from the battlefield. In source v, it also tel ls how Seacole was in the very front line treating the wounded, which was unfeignedly a heroic act because during that time females were seen weak and delicate, let solely belong on the battlefield, but she showed courage under fire, unlike some officers and risked her own life to save others.This also links to the topic of angel because like a guardian angel she was protecting them, and she whitethorn also have appeared physically like an angel to some of the soldiers as she drifted through the battlefields healing people. This shows the bravery and effort of Seacole puts in helping the soldiers, and the occurrence that she treated the wounded at the scene might have contributed with the carry of death-rate. Her British Hotel was also an important refuge to the soldiers, which again comes to the idea mercy, as it says in source V that the soldiers felt more at ease with Mother Seacole than in the hospital, because the hotel was more homelike. Unlike Nightingale, briefly checkin g the patient and ordering the nurses, Seacole was more socializing and hands on approach to the individuals, therefore she was closer with the soldiers since she ran the hotel by herself and did everything by herself, on the other hand Nightingale did very little nursing and more works on the trail and organizing of the hospital, which shows that she was more of an administrator than a nurse.Seacole approach of treating wounded and patients suffering from cholera and dysentery was more effective than Nightingales method, showing that Seacole was more good and had more knowledge on medicine. Source V points out that, Seacole was certainly kind, caring, empathizing like an angel of mercy, because she was the figure of a puzzle to the soldiers and attentive to their practical needs. She nurtured them, like a mother would for their children, providing physical and mental when they are away from home and family, and also providing them with pocket handkerchief for the winter. She was respect and loved by the soldiers and that is how she received the name Mother Seacole, and the soldiers also put an event after the war to thank her.However, media neglected Seacoles acquirement because of her race and attributed the title of angel of mercy to Nightingale. But there are evidences which prove that the hospitality that Seacole provided was better and more effective than Nightingales. Seacole not only treated the wounded because she was a nurse, but that helping soldiers was her passion the strong, brave, determine, motherly characteristic of Seacole allowed her to provide the best for the soldiers during the war. She did everything from scratch on her own, whilst Nightingale was just appointed to run the hospital on top of that Seacole put in more effort in taking care of the soldiers and was more compassionated than Nightingale. Mary Seacole was on hand for the troops in the long months when naught much appeared to be happening just like a mother, which is figur atively close to an angel, showing that she was indeed the real angel of mercy.