Love is Love and Nothing Less Essay Example for Free

have a go at it is Love and Nothing Less EssayIn reflecting on my life as a child, adolescent, and adult, I have experienced know and lack of kip downmaking on many occasions in the family dealingships Ive experienced with others. To me, jockey is something that is present or is non present and can non be split into various differing forms. I have never met the perfect, most ideal individual who has make fuckd me unconditionally, unendingly, and without interruption.The closest Ive come to the ideal love has been through my religion, my spirituality, in my faithful relationship with God and Jesus Christ. However, even in this relationship, I have had my doubts, even if Jesus Christ, God, has never had them, so in this case as well, love has been interrupted. However, many of my relationships have mixd gentle put to workions, and it saddens me to recall the situations when love has been move out and hatred has crept into its place.Robert Sternberg has an interestin g theory in regard to his attempt to separate out love and dissect it into varying forms, however, it is obvious that he often misses the mark in regard to what love means. The ii categories which I consider to be rational evaluations of the presence or lack of presence of love argon Sternbergs two categories of nonlove and consummate love. To me, its always either whizz or the other, and hotshot cannot occupy to have a portion of love just now not really, as if love has a greyish atomic number 18a.In assuming that love has a grey or midrange area, unmatched has to admit believing that rigor mixes with good or that right and wrong are somehow united in a net profit of reality, however, in my opinion, good and good and bad is bad, wrong and right are separate, and ethics has to assume a position in regard to defining a loving way of being or loving action. Sternberg assumes that liking someone is only intimacy, devoid of passion and commitment, and in my opinion, this is i llogical, as many loving relations with other people who Ive considered friends or strangers, people who Ive aliked, have contained passion and commitment as well.Loving actions are filled with many aspects, and liking a somebody includes love, passion, commitment, respect, kindness, and many other values. To like someone most for certain includes having passion and commitment towards this other person. If we as a community and glossiness dont have passion, commitment, and intimacy towards all members, and therefore something is surely going wrong. Perhaps Sternberg is act to imply that relationships with ones spouse or family members are in some ways opposite from other relationships?If this is so, then(prenominal) he should focus on the unique attributes of playing the role of wife, son, father, or friend, and not focus on attempting to separate love into differing categories. The way one loves a person may vary, but love itself is uninterrupted. The idea that infatuatio n, fatuousness, or emptiness has anything to do with love is also unreasonable. How can love itself incorporate anything negative? Obsession, falsity, and voidance are certainly not aspects of love, passion, intimacy, or commitment. Has there ever been a clock when being loving and kind to some other person has incorporated elements of negativity?In and of itself, love is positive. It raises people up and makes them feel wonderful. In Sternbergs attempt to triangulate love into three arenas, intimacy, passion, and commitment, he attempts to pip love with a poison of hatred or malevolence. If love is always good natured and good acting, then love cannot be split apart. People may, at times, at many times, cease to treat one another lovingly, cease to demonstrate the goods of intimacy, passion, and commitment, but that is simply the fault of the person and not an aspect of love itself.It is refreshing that Sternberg categorizes some of his love categories positively and not negativ ely, such as liking, romantic, companionate, and consummate, however this does not adequately explain or do justice to the fact that his other four supposed categories of love, nonlove, infatuated, empty, and fatuous are negatively termed. In my opinion, nonloving, infatuated, empty, and fatuous ways of behaving are part of hatred or evil and absent of love. If love is the right action in the right time and place with the right person, then love is fully good and absent of any mistakes.When Sternberg attempts to justify a decouple by claiming that the reason for the divorce is that one or both of the partners were loving one another, just loving one another differently, then he has certainly fallen prone to bad logic (Sternberg, 331). A divorce or a split is never caused by love, but rather by hateful or wrong actions by one person against another. It may be difficult to voice and communicate these wrong actions, however, a split, a lack of love, cannot be caused by love itself, bu t rather only by its absence.Although love shown towards one person or another may by expressed differently from one situation and person to the next, love itself is never aversive, yet rather uniting. The only culprit of divorce is the person behaving in nonloving ways. Sandelands actually adequately states that the business of business is the kind person. E precisething that people do, everything that people were created by God to do, involves the spirit of the human person. Anyone believing that actions are just actions, that business is just business, devoid of the human person, has lost touch with the consequence of the high moral element of right action (93).In my own life, there have certainly been times when I acted in unloving ways towards other people, when I was empty of good leave alone, false in my intentions. I remember lying to my mother, hurting my sisters, screaming at my father. My past boyfriends were often disgusted by my lack of fidelity. My daughter and husb and are equally reviled by my bad manners when I gorge or eat sloppily. However, I also thankfully know that I have exuded love towards others. My father, mother, and sisters enjoyed it when I created a restaurant at home and cooked for everyone.My past boyfriends were often amused by my sentiency of irritability in playfully lightening the moment. The caresses and kind words I offer to my husband and daughter are filled with benevolence, peace, and grace of God. It is in the interests of the whole of society to recognize that caring as a virtue and an act of ethics is a natural point of soak up inseparably related to love as a world(a) value (Arman Rehnfeldt, 4). When a person decides to love another person, any other person, then one consciously decides to do well towards another person and to not do badly toward another person.The sense that there is any type of human inaction proves false the fact that the universe is in constant motion. Every act or ceasing to act is directly related to cause and effect and can be categorized as fruitful or harmful. Although my mother may believe that being silent towards me is efficaciously loving and appropriate, I may believe that she does not love me. However, if I change my point of view and see that she is simply being silent and loving me by doing so, we come into agreement with one another and I cease to be negatively resistant to her goodwill.Also, if I loudly kiss my husband and he believes that Im being sarcastic or hateful towards him, then I may very well be being sarcastic toward him in my actions. However, if I am aiming to love him in my kiss, then he himself is being paranoid for believing that I am not. We human beings are such sharp creatures and it is often difficult to recognize and show love, however, the clear definition of love as a positive, ethical, valuable, and universal presence is vital in being able to correctly identify, demonstrate, and evoke loving actions.Erikson, a drawing c ard in the study of psychosocial human knowledge, believes that people moving through the stage of young adulthood will pass through a phase of either attaining intimacy with a romantic partner or a friend or failing to achieve intimacy and becoming isolated (Goodman Mukulincer, 396). Although intimacy is great throughout the entire life of a person, perhaps it is good to note that young adulthood is in the main the time when people are selecting romantic partners and mates.Despite the fact that people from about puberty frontwards toward death may seek vision with another person, many people on the search for romance are indeed young adults. However, it is very important, as in the case with Sternbergs theory, not to cut people in too much. Ericksons ideas about intimacy and other issues related to life development are valid and worthy of consideration, but human beings crave and need intimacy from birth until death. sentimentalist love may be a special kind of love involving sexuality and more bodily and deep interaction, reserved for ones mate and life partner, however, love in general is infallible for every person, from conception until natural death. It would be good for people to open their hearts and minds up to the diligence of love and to make it a personal life goal or a life last to work on demonstrating true self giving loving acts to everyone around them.Even though love may look different in varying situations between varying people, the underlying genuine goodwill is always there, love as a purposeful gift of positive and uplifting interaction.ReferencesArman, M. Rehnsfeldt, A. (2006). The Presence of Love in Ethical Caring. Nursing Forum 41(1), 4-12. Goodman, G. Mikulincer, M. (2006). Dynamics of romantic love attachment, caregiving, and sex. Guilford Press. Sandelands, L. (2009). The Business of Business is the military man Person Lessons from the Catholic Social Tradition. Journal of Business Ethics 85, 93-101. Sternberg, R. Tri angulating Love. The Altruism Reader, 331-333.