Reducing the Age of Drinking to 18 Years in the U.S Research Paper

Reducing the Age of Drinking to 18 Years in the U.S - query Paper ExampleIt also suggests that a small percent come on of drinkers consumes most of the alcohol. This small percentage a lot consumes several drinks at once increasing the risk of serious health and safety problems. When comp ard to the data representing pocket-sized drinkers the following conclusions were made, the proportion of puppylike drinkers who report heavy inebriation is higher than for adults the image being 43 percent for adults and 50 percent for young drinkers (U.S. Department of justice 1,2). The reason behind federal licitity regulating the age for alcohol consumption was due to the rise in highway fatalities. The uniform drinkable age act of 1984 threatened to withdraw highway funds from the state that failed to increase the negligible legal drinking age to 21. This law saved lives this was due to the decline in motor vehicle fatalities (Miron and Tetellbaum 10). economically speaking in order t o consider the stripped age of drinking an estimation of the loss in consumer surplus that results from cut pluralitys alcohol consumption is put into consideration. It also requires the benefits to the drinker and to others from reducing alcohol related harms. Lowering of the drinking age in U.S. to 18 has been a primary military campaign for most activists the argument being 18 is the age agreed upon by most states. Again, 18 is the age of the majority for other activities such as voting military service serving on the jury. These facts discombobulate 18 a focal head up when we compare U.S. to other countries who have set their age at 18 (Carpenter and Dobkin 135). The age set by U.S. is the highest in the world, majority of the rest of the world have the marginal age at 17 or 16 others have no minimum age. Many view asers of the minimum age argue that the human brain develops until the age of 21. However, many experts are keen on dismissing this point saying it would mean that only the U.S hold on to this idea. The current federal age as argued by most critics seemed to have reduced the total underage consumption. However, they argue that underage persons who consumed alcohol are more likely to do so behind closed doors. The danger would be their overindulgence in alcohol consumption as soon as the get access to the stuff. Mitchell who is a supporter of the reducing of the minimum age to 18 argues that the reduction in highway fatalities is due to safer and better-built cars and the increased awareness of the dangers in drinking and driving. Mitchell points out that delaying of young adults exposure to alcohol is not a bright idea (310). Most college students support the idea of dark the drinking age to 1. According to the daily sundial, some of the reports quoted illustrates that most young people found it ok for young people to enjoy themselves after a long week of analyse and working. Others argued that 18 was the focal point age whereby thing s opened up it are the age that one acquired two-fold obligations. Others argued from a health perspective saying, alcohol is healthy when consumed in moderation it reduces the risk of heart diseases to lowering the likelihood of gallstones. The argument is taken further by comparing other countries such as chinaware France Italy and Spain whose minimum legal drinking age is 18. The youth in these countries are allowed to consume alcohol however, they are taught to drink in moderation. The youth state that the current law is unreasonable and ineffective in that young people always have